GORDEN OWUSU KEGYA
Upload to our gallery now! keyboard_arrow_right
This reads like a hurried dump of map screenshots with zero editorial control. You have lots of content, none of it presented with a clear purpose, hierarchy, or consistent visual rules. If you want someone to understand a place or a pattern in any of these pieces, you have made it hard or impossible. Below is a brutal, specific breakdown of what is wrong and exactly what to do to make these maps good.
Major problems
1) No visual hierarchy or focal point
Everything competes for attention: bright saturated color blobs, many labels, multiple inset maps. The eye has no place to rest and no single story to follow.
Fix: decide the main message for each map. Use size, contrast, and saturation to emphasize the primary element and tone down everything else.
2) Inconsistent and conflicting styles
Each tile uses different palettes, icon styles, stroke widths, and type sizes. When placed together they look amateur and indecisive.
Fix: create a style guide before you draw another map. Define 3 type sizes, 3 color roles (background, primary, secondary), consistent iconography and line weights. Apply across all maps.
3) Poor legibility of type and symbols
Labels are tiny, overlapping, sometimes with no separation from complex backgrounds. Some colors lack contrast against land or water.
Fix: increase label size relative to map scale, use font weights and hierarchy, add a semi-opaque halo or outline for labels on busy backgrounds, and maintain minimum contrast ratios. Use fonts designed for maps like Source Sans or Noto Sans for clarity.
4) Bad color choices and color-blind insensitivity
Saturated, clashing palettes and red/green contrasts that will fail many viewers. Low contrast between water and land in places.
Fix: use color palettes from ColorBrewer or Adobe Color that are sequential or diverging as appropriate and are color-blind safe. Limit the palette to 3-5 hues per map. Reduce saturation for secondary elements.
5) Overcluttered symbology and data noise
Too many point symbols, decorative icons, and ungrouped features make the map look like noise. There is no simplification or generalization.
Fix: reduce symbol types, aggregate or cluster dense point patterns, generalize vector detail for the intended scale, and use graduated symbols with clear breaks rather than dozens of arbitrary colors.
6) Missing or inadequate cartographic fundamentals
Many tiles lack readable scale bars, north arrows, legends, coordinate grids, or source attribution. Projections are unclear and not optimized for the region.
Fix: always include a scale bar and legend sized to be legible at intended viewing size. State the projection and data source where relevant. Choose an appropriate projection for the geography being shown.
7) Composition and layout issues
Maps are haphazardly cropped with inconsistent margins and no alignment grid. Insets are placed inconsistently and sometimes overlap.
Fix: use a grid for layout. Maintain consistent margins and spacing. Align map components and group related elements. Give each map breathing room and a clear title, subtitle, caption.
8) Low resolution and raster artifacts
Some images look pixelated or are screenshots with compression artifacts, which kills credibility and readability.
Fix: export maps at higher resolution and use vector outputs (SVG/PDF) for linework and labels. Avoid pasting low-res screenshots into compositions.
9) Typography problems
Random fonts, inconsistent capitalization, poor hierarchy and kerning. Labels are sometimes all caps, sometimes sentence case, inconsistent sizes.
Fix: pick one or two typefaces and stick with them. Use size and weight to create hierarchy. Use sentence case for labels unless a readable all-caps style is intentional and controlled.
10) No clear audience or purpose
Are these reference maps, travel maps, thematic maps, or drafts? Right now they serve no target audience.
Fix: define the audience and the single take-away for each map. Design everything around that take-away.
Concrete, actionable fixes (step-by-step)
1) Pick one map from this collage. Decide its single message and audience in one sentence.
2) Rebuild that map from vector data. Clean and generalize features for the scale you want.
3) Apply a deliberate color palette: 1 background, 1 primary, 1 accent, 1 neutral. Test with a color-blindness simulator.
4) Create a typographic hierarchy: title 18-24 pt, subtitles 12-14 pt, labels 8-11 pt depending on output. Use halo or contrast boxes for labels on complex backgrounds.
5) Add a legend, scale bar, north arrow, and source line. Make them consistent in style and placement.
6) Export at final intended resolution. Check legibility at 100% zoom and at the size your audience will view it.
7) Repeat for the other maps using the same style guide so they form a coherent set.
Exercises to improve your skills
Redraw one of these maps as a simplified poster: strip 70% of elements and focus on the single story.
Create a symbol set of 20 icons and apply them consistently across three maps.
Build three color schemes for the same map: one monochrome, one diverging, and one qualitative. Compare readability and accessibility.
Do a before/after: place the original and your revised version side by side and note every improvement in legibility and hierarchy.
Tools, resources and quick references
Use QGIS for data handling and basic styling, then Illustrator or Affinity Designer for final polishing.
ColorBrewer2.org or vis-colors for accessible palettes.
Read "Designing Better Maps" by Cynthia Brewer and "Thematic Cartography and Geovisualization" by Slocum for theory and practice.
Check contrast with WebAIM or Color Oracle for color blindness simulation.
Final blunt note
You have useful raw material but no discipline in presentation. Right now these maps scream amateur. If you enforce constraints, simplify aggressively, and design from purpose outward instead of from detail inward, your work will go from confusing noise to clear, professional cartography. Do the hard cuts. Kill your favorite unnecessary elements. Make each map earn its place.

Comments
Post a Comment